... 1/10 ppl read the whole thing
signature
1v1 me in Rocket League
(Nov 5th, 2018, 06:24 AM)Hypogre link Wrote: ... 1/10 ppl read the whole thing
Yeah, I wouldn't doubt it. I guess zs is still the showman with no meat on his bones by not proving this wrong.
(Nov 5th, 2018, 06:10 PM)HeadlessCowboy link Wrote: [quote author=Hypogre link=topic=5937.msg36112#msg36112 date=1541424295]
... 1/10 ppl read the whole thing
Yeah, I wouldn't doubt it. I guess zs is still the showman with no meat on his bones by not proving this wrong.
[/quote]
I claim to have a dragon in my garage that only I can tangibly interact with and see. If you can't prove me wrong then there is a dragon in my garage.
There is a reason we don't use that type of logic, simply because it is incorrect. The expectation is that you prove a positive claim not prove a negative one. This is a pretty big pillar we use to find the truth and how science and law progress.
Should we believe everything until we can disprove it or just believe in things that are proven?
signature
(Nov 5th, 2018, 07:44 PM)DogTag93 link Wrote: [quote author=HeadlessCowboy link=topic=5937.msg36114#msg36114 date=1541466621]
[quote author=Hypogre link=topic=5937.msg36112#msg36112 date=1541424295]
... 1/10 ppl read the whole thing
Yeah, I wouldn't doubt it. I guess zs is still the showman with no meat on his bones by not proving this wrong.
[/quote]
I claim to have a dragon in my garage that only I can tangibly interact with and see. If you can't prove me wrong then there is a dragon in my garage.
There is a reason we don't use that type of logic, simply because it is incorrect. The expectation is that you prove a positive claim not prove a negative one. This is a pretty big pillar we use to find the truth and how science and law progress.
Should we believe everything until we can disprove it or just believe in things that are proven?
[/quote]
Dogtag, "Your perception isn't always as it is in reality, but your perception feels like reality." Or in other words, your viewpoint isn't always as it is in the real world, but your viewpoint feels like the real world. Next time read.
I can overrule the USA Supreme Court using what I have posted in this thread, can you think and figure this out? Read, learn, it is good for you to think critically. If you cannot figure it out, just ask and I'll prove it to you.
Innocent until proven guilty
signature
The Reformed One
(Nov 5th, 2018, 07:53 PM)ItsKelinu link Wrote: Innocent until proven guilty
Just for fun to ask:
Then why are you arrested if you are innocent?
Quote:"Dogtag, "Your perception isn't always as it is in reality, but your perception feels like reality." Or in other words, your viewpoint isn't always as it is in the real world, but your viewpoint feels like the real world. Next time read.
Our own perceptions and how errored they are one of the reasons why what I said is an important pillar. I'm not in disagreement with your quote and what I said isn't either. What I said was making a point using your own logic. The fact you are in disagreement with my metaphor proves to me you don't know what your talking about. Nice try bud.
Quote:I can overrule the USA Supreme Court using what I have posted in this thread, can you think and figure this out? Read, learn, it is good for you to think critically. If you cannot figure it out, just ask and I'll prove it to you."
That's a bold claim Headless, can't wait to see you actually do it. I'm rooting for you! What I've learned from being on the internet for the last 15 years is how to identify trolls and spam. You discussing the philosophy of law doesn't make the weird conclusions you come up with to be true, sounds more like religion to me.
"Just in! A minecraft player on the internet overrules the supreme court!" I strongly doubt it, but hey your just a "showman with no meat on his bones by not proving this wrong"
signature
(Nov 5th, 2018, 07:57 PM)HeadlessCowboy link Wrote: [quote author=ItsKelinu link=topic=5937.msg36120#msg36120 date=1541472817]
Innocent until proven guilty
Just for fun to ask:
Then why are you arrested if you are innocent?
[/quote] people get arrested and sentenced to jail that are innocent sometimes... Also police can arrest you if they think you might know something about an illegal act even if you don’t know shit.
signature
(Nov 5th, 2018, 08:22 PM)DogTag93 link Wrote: Quote:"Dogtag, "Your perception isn't always as it is in reality, but your perception feels like reality." Or in other words, your viewpoint isn't always as it is in the real world, but your viewpoint feels like the real world. Next time read.
Our own perceptions and how errored they are one of the reasons why what I said is an important pillar. I'm not in disagreement with your quote and what I said isn't either. What I said was making a point using your own logic. The fact you are in disagreement with my metaphor proves to me you don't know what your talking about. Nice try bud.
Each perception also has this to think about this:
"No matter how much something (Perception) is weighed, if it overrides it, it still overrides it."
(Nov 5th, 2018, 08:22 PM)DogTag93 link Wrote: Quote:I can overrule the USA Supreme Court using what I have posted in this thread, can you think and figure this out? Read, learn, it is good for you to think critically. If you cannot figure it out, just ask and I'll prove it to you."
That's a bold claim Headless, can't wait to see you actually do it. I'm rooting for you! What I've learned from being on the internet for the last 15 years is how to identify trolls and spam. You discussing the philosophy of law doesn't make the weird conclusions you come up with to be true, sounds more like religion to me.
"Just in! A minecraft player on the internet overrules the supreme court!" I strongly doubt it, but hey your just a "showman with no meat on his bones by not proving this wrong"
Read this:
(Nov 4th, 2018, 06:51 AM)HeadlessCowboy link Wrote: Everyone in the supremacy clause has the right for me to have the right to be an international judge. Then having the right of potential/actual preamble (Yes I can prove it to be a right)/speech/press/religion/peaceably assemble/petition the Government for a redress of grievances/legal arms/Quartering Soldiers (Officers)/Search and Seizures right of property/supremacy clause/14th amendment acting as an international judge. Yes, I beat all of the counters on each right that makes it so I can be an international judge. If you would like to know more because you cannot figure it out yourself, just ask here. =)
Then per Resolution 217(a), part of life is your rights and these rights cannot be taken away due to Article 30 in the Resolution/treaty. You may have to think about this for a little if things don't come easy for you.
I use take in use take dibs at this moment to take it as a right to be an international judge. This is a loophole around the supremacy clause.
Remember, no matter how much something is weighed, if it overrides it, it still overrides it
Then read the following:
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." (Not a direct quote).
Then think of this again:
(Nov 4th, 2018, 06:51 AM)HeadlessCowboy link Wrote: Everyone in the supremacy clause has the right for me to have the right to be an international judge. Then having the right of potential/actual preamble (Yes I can prove it to be a right)/speech/press/religion/peaceably assemble/petition the Government for a redress of grievances/legal arms/Quartering Soldiers (Officers)/Search and Seizures right of property/supremacy clause/14th amendment acting as an international judge. Yes, I beat all of the counters on each right that makes it so I can be an international judge. If you would like to know more because you cannot figure it out yourself, just ask here. =)
Then per Resolution 217(a), part of life is your rights and these rights cannot be taken away due to Article 30 in the Resolution/treaty. You may have to think about this for a little if things don't come easy for you.
I use take in use take dibs at this moment to take it as a right to be an international judge. This is a loophole around the supremacy clause.
Remember, no matter how much something is weighed, if it overrides it, it still overrides it
Makes it so the rights in the constitution of the government can be waived. Constitution and laws are forms of laws, while treaties are forms of laws in a functional grammatical sense using the 14th amendment of equal protection.
Read the first post to be able to beat the one dictionary rule, and that the 14th amendment part is only directed towards states (providences). States can be defined as both providences and nations. Parts of nations are the organizations. Part of the law is the legal document and if each legal document is equally protected, treaties are above the constitution since the government waived its rights on the constitution by making the treaty. So treaty and the right to waive constitutional rights would outweigh the laws on the books.
Then use the following (Instead of making me an international judge it makes it so I can overrule the USA Supreme Court by making UN law (treaty) and constitutional rights ovveridding the rest of the constitution and laws):
(Nov 4th, 2018, 06:51 AM)HeadlessCowboy link Wrote: Everyone in the supremacy clause has the right for me to have the right to be an international judge. Then having the right of potential/actual preamble (Yes I can prove it to be a right)/speech/press/religion/peaceably assemble/petition the Government for a redress of grievances/legal arms/Quartering Soldiers (Officers)/Search and Seizures right of property/supremacy clause/14th amendment acting as an international judge. Yes, I beat all of the counters on each right that makes it so I can be an international judge. If you would like to know more because you cannot figure it out yourself, just ask here. =)
Then per Resolution 217(a), part of life is your rights and these rights cannot be taken away due to Article 30 in the Resolution/treaty. You may have to think about this for a little if things don't come easy for you.
I use take in use take dibs at this moment to take it as a right to be an international judge. This is a loophole around the supremacy clause.
Remember, no matter how much something is weighed, if it overrides it, it still overrides it
If you need help any more, just ask =)
(Nov 5th, 2018, 09:29 PM)masterovieOG link Wrote: [quote author=HeadlessCowboy link=topic=5937.msg36121#msg36121 date=1541473059]
[quote author=ItsKelinu link=topic=5937.msg36120#msg36120 date=1541472817]
Innocent until proven guilty
Just for fun to ask:
Then why are you arrested if you are innocent?
[/quote] people get arrested and sentenced to jail that are innocent sometimes... Also police can arrest you if they think you might know something about an illegal act even if you don’t know shit.
[/quote]
You are correct Ovie.
|