+- CDGS (https://forums.cdgs.net)
+-- Forum: General Minecraft (https://forums.cdgs.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=70)
+--- Forum: Network Ban Appeal (https://forums.cdgs.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=78)
+--- Thread: Killah's Ban Appeal (again) (/showthread.php?tid=15259)
Re: Killah's Ban Appeal (again) - b_bob58 - Mar 10th, 2016
(Mar 10th, 2016, 09:48 PM)MaxofTheMiniGames link Wrote: [quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19821#msg19821 date=1457671654]
[quote author=b_bob58 link=topic=3528.msg19819#msg19819 date=1457671616]
[quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19817#msg19817 date=1457671564]
Look at your replies? I never said i didn't like him however when watched by an Admin then banned for hacks i would side with the admin...... Personally only people in the fight should post a response as anyone else can't comment about this fight as you was not there. This is his second ban for hacking for the same thing in 2 days.
I was in skype with him both times he was banned, therefore I am involved.
[/quote]
You was not online nor did you see this fight that Zeedin was watching.....
[/quote]
No, neither I need to be. He is a server warden, I am pretty sure he does not want to Cull his server population -_-
[/quote]
None of what you just quoted was directed toward you or Zeedin...?
Re: Killah's Ban Appeal (again) - zs471 - Mar 10th, 2016
(Mar 10th, 2016, 09:49 PM)TGOutbreak link Wrote: [quote author=zs471 link=topic=3528.msg19822#msg19822 date=1457671685]As said before the first ban was unwarranted and therefore irrelevant. We may have not been in the fight, but we can state facts and stand up for his character.
[quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19817#msg19817 date=1457671564]
Look at your replies? I never said i didn't like him however when watched by an Admin then banned for hacks i would side with the admin...... Personally only people in the fight should post a response as anyone else can't comment about this fight as you was not there. This is his second ban for hacking for the same thing in 2 days.
[/quote]
Banned twice for the same thing, That first ban now seems warranted now. You can stand up for a persons Character by all means, doesn't mean he didn't hack though.
[/quote]
Disagree, you basically just said the same thing over again. What you are saying does not prove he hacks, so why would what I say prove he does not hack?
Re: Killah's Ban Appeal (again) - MaxofTheMiniGames - Mar 10th, 2016
(Mar 10th, 2016, 09:50 PM)b_bob58 link Wrote: [quote author=MaxofTheMiniGames link=topic=3528.msg19825#msg19825 date=1457671738]
[quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19821#msg19821 date=1457671654]
[quote author=b_bob58 link=topic=3528.msg19819#msg19819 date=1457671616]
[quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19817#msg19817 date=1457671564]
Look at your replies? I never said i didn't like him however when watched by an Admin then banned for hacks i would side with the admin...... Personally only people in the fight should post a response as anyone else can't comment about this fight as you was not there. This is his second ban for hacking for the same thing in 2 days.
I was in skype with him both times he was banned, therefore I am involved.
[/quote]
You was not online nor did you see this fight that Zeedin was watching.....
[/quote]
No, neither I need to be. He is a server warden, I am pretty sure he does not want to Cull his server population -_-
[/quote]
None of what you just quoted was directed toward you or Zeedin...?
[/quote]
Sorry misinterpreted it
Re: Killah's Ban Appeal (again) - Killah - Mar 10th, 2016
This is literal nonsense, I can prove my innocence by showing my whole files , and zeedin isn't even willing to do the fair bit to check my files for any hacked client.
Re: Killah's Ban Appeal (again) - Gabriela - Mar 10th, 2016
GUYS HE WASNT EVEN HACKING THIS IS SO STUPID
Re: Killah's Ban Appeal (again) - TGOutbreak - Mar 10th, 2016
(Mar 10th, 2016, 09:51 PM)zs471 link Wrote: [quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19826#msg19826 date=1457671781]As said before the first ban was unwarranted and therefore irrelevant. We may have not been in the fight, but we can state facts and stand up for his character.
[quote author=zs471 link=topic=3528.msg19822#msg19822 date=1457671685]
[quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19817#msg19817 date=1457671564]
Look at your replies? I never said i didn't like him however when watched by an Admin then banned for hacks i would side with the admin...... Personally only people in the fight should post a response as anyone else can't comment about this fight as you was not there. This is his second ban for hacking for the same thing in 2 days.
[/quote]
Banned twice for the same thing, That first ban now seems warranted now. You can stand up for a persons Character by all means, doesn't mean he didn't hack though.
[/quote]
Disagree, you basically just said the same thing over again. What you are saying does not prove he hacks, so why would what I say prove he does not hack?
[/quote]
Zeedin watched him in the fight before he give Killah his ban. You can sugar coat it as much as you want. He got caught hacking and banned for that. Not sure how you can argue when the person who banned him watched him.
Re: Killah's Ban Appeal (again) - MaxofTheMiniGames - Mar 10th, 2016
(Mar 10th, 2016, 09:51 PM)zs471 link Wrote: [quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19826#msg19826 date=1457671781]As said before the first ban was unwarranted and therefore irrelevant. We may have not been in the fight, but we can state facts and stand up for his character.
[quote author=zs471 link=topic=3528.msg19822#msg19822 date=1457671685]
[quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19817#msg19817 date=1457671564]
Look at your replies? I never said i didn't like him however when watched by an Admin then banned for hacks i would side with the admin...... Personally only people in the fight should post a response as anyone else can't comment about this fight as you was not there. This is his second ban for hacking for the same thing in 2 days.
[/quote]
Banned twice for the same thing, That first ban now seems warranted now. You can stand up for a persons Character by all means, doesn't mean he didn't hack though.
[/quote]
Disagree, you basically just said the same thing over again. What you are saying does not prove he hacks, so why would what I say prove he does not hack?
[/quote]
It does give some authenticity to his decision tho
Re: Killah's Ban Appeal (again) - zs471 - Mar 10th, 2016
(Mar 10th, 2016, 09:53 PM)TGOutbreak link Wrote: [quote author=zs471 link=topic=3528.msg19828#msg19828 date=1457671915]As said before the first ban was unwarranted and therefore irrelevant. We may have not been in the fight, but we can state facts and stand up for his character.
[quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19826#msg19826 date=1457671781]
[quote author=zs471 link=topic=3528.msg19822#msg19822 date=1457671685]
[quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19817#msg19817 date=1457671564]
Look at your replies? I never said i didn't like him however when watched by an Admin then banned for hacks i would side with the admin...... Personally only people in the fight should post a response as anyone else can't comment about this fight as you was not there. This is his second ban for hacking for the same thing in 2 days.
[/quote]
Banned twice for the same thing, That first ban now seems warranted now. You can stand up for a persons Character by all means, doesn't mean he didn't hack though.
[/quote]
Disagree, you basically just said the same thing over again. What you are saying does not prove he hacks, so why would what I say prove he does not hack?
[/quote]
Zeedin watched him in the fight before he give Killah his ban. You can sugar coat it as much as you want. He got caught hacking and banned for that. Not sure how you can argue when the person who banned him watched him.
[/quote]
Have all of the previous replies slipped your memory? Do you have short term memory loss? Perhaps you're just choosing to forget previously stated facts to support your own argument.
Re: Killah's Ban Appeal (again) - zs471 - Mar 10th, 2016
I remember in MCP V3 a couple years ago, nearly everybody assumed Geonat(_bombsquad_) was hacking, because he was better than everyone else. Geonat is really good at pvp, better than anyone else on V3, so everybody assumed he was hacking with unwarranted accusations.
This situation reminds me much of that, Killah is fantastic at PvP, FACT. People assume he hacks, so he gets ban. Very similar to Geonat.
Re: Killah's Ban Appeal (again) - TGOutbreak - Mar 10th, 2016
(Mar 10th, 2016, 09:55 PM)zs471 link Wrote: [quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19832#msg19832 date=1457672025]As said before the first ban was unwarranted and therefore irrelevant. We may have not been in the fight, but we can state facts and stand up for his character.
[quote author=zs471 link=topic=3528.msg19828#msg19828 date=1457671915]
[quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19826#msg19826 date=1457671781]
[quote author=zs471 link=topic=3528.msg19822#msg19822 date=1457671685]
[quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19817#msg19817 date=1457671564]
Look at your replies? I never said i didn't like him however when watched by an Admin then banned for hacks i would side with the admin...... Personally only people in the fight should post a response as anyone else can't comment about this fight as you was not there. This is his second ban for hacking for the same thing in 2 days.
[/quote]
Banned twice for the same thing, That first ban now seems warranted now. You can stand up for a persons Character by all means, doesn't mean he didn't hack though.
[/quote]
Disagree, you basically just said the same thing over again. What you are saying does not prove he hacks, so why would what I say prove he does not hack?
[/quote]
Zeedin watched him in the fight before he give Killah his ban. You can sugar coat it as much as you want. He got caught hacking and banned for that. Not sure how you can argue when the person who banned him watched him.
[/quote]
Have all of the previous replies slipped your memory? Do you have short term memory loss? Perhaps you're just choosing to forget previously stated facts to support your own argument.
[/quote]
Again you was not even on the server did not see the fight nor know what happened. I trust the staff on the server and as he was banned means he was hacking. Also i have read the previous replies and his friends/faction members are posting there opinion but was not there to see what happened. Like i said he was watched by an Admin during the fight and banned for hacking. Kind of speaks for itself.