Just wondering what people think. Who thinks mit was a better mod, or S_RYan. Both of them are very similar. S_Ryan is strict and so is Mit. I personally loved mit as mod. If you think S_Ryan is better say "S_Ryan>Mit" If Mit is better, do the opposite. Not trying to be offensive, just wondering what everyone thinks of the 2 strictest mods MCP has ever had.
signature
//
Mit was an asshole. S_Ryan is a strict moderator. Difference.
S_Ryan is not a mod.
He is a better staff member than Mit was though.
signature
(Dec 19th, 2015, 12:32 PM)Domybuttmister link Wrote: Mit was an asshole. S_Ryan is a strict moderator. Difference.
I've always been an asshole but that was taken to a different level when I was mod don't worry
(Dec 19th, 2015, 01:54 PM)zs471 link Wrote: He is a better staff member than Mit was though.
Anyone with the capability to be nice is better than me at staff.
signature
It's not a beginning at all. Tonight is an ending.
who is better warden
natefoster or astral
signature
where did Warden astral go
(Dec 19th, 2015, 03:18 PM)pointlessbob link Wrote: who is better warden
natefoster or astral
Astral
signature
It's not a beginning at all. Tonight is an ending.
Mit > S_Ryan Mit is kind of a dick a lot, but S_Ryan lacks some of the main things he needs to be a good staff member, he does not pay attention to the facts as I have seen personally. He hears what he wants and says thats what it is, and I think even though Mit can be a huge ass sometimes, he is still better than S_Ryan, who also, the last time I checked, is only nice to his friends. That's called favoritism, mit was an ass to everyone which means he did not be a choosy prick. That is why I think Mit is a better staff member than S_Ryan
I personally feel mit was better because he was an ass to everyone. I feel sometimes S_Ryan abuses a lot and same with mit. But then again every staff member abuses once in a while. I think mit was better because he was a neutral mod
signature
//