Mar 10th, 2016, 09:54 PM
(Mar 10th, 2016, 09:51 PM)zs471 link Wrote: [quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19826#msg19826 date=1457671781]As said before the first ban was unwarranted and therefore irrelevant. We may have not been in the fight, but we can state facts and stand up for his character.
[quote author=zs471 link=topic=3528.msg19822#msg19822 date=1457671685]
[quote author=TGOutbreak link=topic=3528.msg19817#msg19817 date=1457671564]
Look at your replies? I never said i didn't like him however when watched by an Admin then banned for hacks i would side with the admin...... Personally only people in the fight should post a response as anyone else can't comment about this fight as you was not there. This is his second ban for hacking for the same thing in 2 days.
[/quote]
Banned twice for the same thing, That first ban now seems warranted now. You can stand up for a persons Character by all means, doesn't mean he didn't hack though.
[/quote]
Disagree, you basically just said the same thing over again. What you are saying does not prove he hacks, so why would what I say prove he does not hack?
[/quote]
It does give some authenticity to his decision tho
signature
F