![]() |
eL33TCREW second appeal - Printable Version +- CDGS (https://forums.cdgs.net) +-- Forum: General Minecraft (https://forums.cdgs.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=70) +--- Forum: Network Ban Appeal (https://forums.cdgs.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=78) +--- Thread: eL33TCREW second appeal (/showthread.php?tid=17399) Pages:
1
2
|
eL33TCREW second appeal - eL33TCREW - Oct 21st, 2018 See http://forums.cdgs.net/index.php/topic,5915.0.html IGN: eL33TCREW Who banned you? dogtag When were you banned? (Time/Date) October 21, 2018, 11:12 am Why were you banned? Use of client Are you at fault? No. What was your rank on MCP? Baron Why should we unban you? You should unban me because I never cheated, the ban was shortened which I appreciate but if I never cheated I shouldn't get a ban at all. The last topic was locked. My rocky past was cited, and I cannot deny it was a bad past but I don't think I should be profiled on the way my past went and I firmly stand behind my position that I was never cheating. Where you fined and do you think you deserve reimbursement? N/A Additional info: Re: eL33TCREW second appeal - DogTag93 - Oct 21st, 2018 Like I stated in your previous appeal I am not going to act on your past because I personally have no experience it plus so far with me you've been pleasant. What I did act on is the fact that you are not a new player and I can bet that you know the rules pretty well. Unless your ban is acted on by higher staff your two-week tempban stands. This ban is not unlike any other bans I have given for similar situations. Re: eL33TCREW second appeal - zs471 - Oct 21st, 2018 [youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grnOlaoOYf4[/youtube] Looks like normal pvp to me. "What I did act on is the fact that you are not a new player and I can bet that you know the rules pretty well." What does that mean and what does it have to do with him cheating or not cheating. Re: eL33TCREW second appeal - DogTag93 - Oct 21st, 2018 (Oct 21st, 2018, 07:15 PM)zs471 link Wrote:[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grnOlaoOYf4[/youtube] There are 3 videos I took in total with that being one of them. The bannable offense was not in this video. That quote basically means that he is not a new player thus he has a slightly longer punishment vs what I would get a newer player for the same offense. Four other staff have looked at the other video I have and confirmed it. Re: eL33TCREW second appeal - zs471 - Oct 21st, 2018 ![]() Source: Re: eL33TCREW second appeal - Dragon1240 - Oct 21st, 2018 (Oct 21st, 2018, 07:48 PM)zs471 link Wrote: The Better Version: ![]() Re: eL33TCREW second appeal - DogTag93 - Oct 21st, 2018 The Best Version ![]() Re: eL33TCREW second appeal - eL33TCREW - Oct 21st, 2018 (Oct 21st, 2018, 10:05 PM)DogTag93 link Wrote:The Best Version I mean it's better made so it must be correct Re: eL33TCREW second appeal - Ryan10000 - Oct 22nd, 2018 (Oct 21st, 2018, 11:14 PM)eL33TCREW link Wrote:I mean it's better made so it must be correct Is this an admission of guilt? Re: eL33TCREW second appeal - zs471 - Oct 22nd, 2018 (Oct 22nd, 2018, 01:10 AM)Ryan10000 link Wrote:[quote author=eL33TCREW link=topic=5919.msg35968#msg35968 date=1540188869] Is this an admission of guilt? [/quote] Is this sarcasm? [sub]link didn't cheat, free link 2018[/sub] |