+- CDGS (https://forums.cdgs.net)
+-- Forum: General Minecraft (https://forums.cdgs.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=70)
+--- Forum: Network Ban Appeal (https://forums.cdgs.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=78)
+--- Thread: MontrealMaven's Ban Appeal (/showthread.php?tid=15898)
Pages:
1
2
Re: MontrealMaven's Ban Appeal - masterovieOG - Sep 12th, 2016
(Sep 12th, 2016, 01:40 PM)polardog11 link Wrote: [quote author=Kunvoi link=topic=4223.msg24414#msg24414 date=1473712290]
+1, I myself do not know the rules well, and have bad history but I don't think this should work up to a perm ban. A temp ban would be more predictable, but a perm ban?
Bypass is always a perm ban. Why should crazy_dog713 be treated any different?
[/quote] because it was a mute and she made a good appeal...
Re: MontrealMaven's Ban Appeal - polardog11 - Sep 12th, 2016
Not to mention this ban is for bypass not for avoiding mute. Crazy_dog713 was also applying for guard and supposedly read all the rules. She should know what was going to happen if she tried bypassing by now.
Re: MontrealMaven's Ban Appeal - masterovieOG - Sep 12th, 2016
User is unbanned lock this post